OHS Canada Magazine

Contentious member of Veterans Affairs review board not asked back

FEDERAL (Canadian OH&S News)

FEDERAL (Canadian OH&S News)

An outspoken veteran and member of the Veterans Review and Appeal Board will not have his tenure with the agency renewed, which some allege is due to his past comments on how the federal government treats its embattled vets.

Harold Leduc, a member of the appeal board since 2005 and a disabled veteran who has suffered post-traumatic stress disorder, was recently sent a letter from Steven Blaney, minister for veterans affairs, informing him that his tenure would not be renewed.

The independent appeal tribunal hears cases from ex-soldiers who are dissatisfied with their disability pensions awarded from Veterans Affairs Canada.

“With everything that’s going on, I wasn’t surprised. But it is actually a little devastating because there’s no real reason,” Leduc contended. “As a disabled veteran, I’m exactly what they’re looking for, so there’s no reason, and they kept others on whose terms were up at the same time.”


Leduc has often voiced his concerns over how Veterans Affairs disrespects former soldiers and had breached his privacy. The latter climaxed when Leduc filed a complaint with the human rights commission, arguing that his private medical information and PTSD diagnosis were being used to discredit him as a board member because he often disagreed with the federal body’s decisions. He won that case.

“There was a settlement and from that point forward, the chair and everybody had a duty to siphon the poison from the work environment. Instead, the adverse behaviour increased,” Leduc said. “They’ve stonewalled me. [This] is part of workplace bullying and there’s no way around that. These are people that are out of control: schoolyard bullies who have now grown up.”

Peter Stoffer, the NDP’s veterans affairs critic and MP for Sackville-Eastern Shore, Nova Scotia, said that Leduc’s termination reflects a toxic culture.

“I’m absolutely disgusted with the government and the way they treat people who speak their minds clearly, honestly and openly. Harold Leduc is a well-respected, well-medaled veteran who served his country bravely,” Stoffer contended.

Stoffer recently introduced a private members bill that would obliterate the board because of inefficiency and a lack of accountability, he said.

 “One of the biggest challenges facing veterans is the Veterans Review and Appeal Board. This is a politically-appointed, non-accountable, arms-length — as they call it — board,” he said. “Eliminate the board, get rid of it completely and change the atmosphere. You see these men and women with their head down and their cap in hand, and it’s almost like they’re begging, the men and women who apply for these benefits. I just want to streamline that process.”

Speaking as a disabled veteran rather than a board member, Leduc disagreed with Stoffer’s proposed legislation, saying that his fellow ex-soldiers want an independent place to go outside of the national department when they feel the department has got it wrong.

Danielle Gauthier, head of communications for the review board, defended the board, saying that such a body is unrivalled when it comes to its accountability for the health and safety of Canadian Forces veterans.

“The board plays a critical role in ensuring that veterans and their families receive the benefits they’re entitled to for service-related disabilities,” she said. “The board’s process is designed to give a fresh new look to cases already ruled upon by Veterans Affairs Canada, and provides veterans with final opportunities to receive or increase disability benefits.”


Print this page



5 Comments » for Contentious member of Veterans Affairs review board not asked back
  1. Stephen Hitchcock (Master Warrant Officer retired) says:

    I have known Harold for 38 years and served with him in the Airborne and the PPCLI. He is a honourable and dedicated man who served with distinction and dedication in the army and is above reproach. To not be renewed to the VRAB is politics plain and simple. Those that chose not to renew the tenure of this dedicated former Warrant Officer and instead appoint a retired general making about 80K pension annually, a retired Colonel making 60K pension annually and a retired major making 45K pension annually and all of them now making 120K salary and per diem on the VRAB, will provide no comfort to the troops. The troops who most end up with disabilities are infantry, armoured, artillary, engineers and medical staff. They know that men like Harold, a retired infantry Warrant Officer fully understands and has expierenced what the front line combat soldier has endured. There will be little confidence that the VRAB now made up of retired officers will have any emphathy. The probelms and complaints against the VRAB will now only get worse.

  2. W.Keller says:

    The fact that Harold Leduc won the previous case should be a clue. I’m not saying that Harold’s position does not contain some extreme elements BUT, bad behaving people usually spin any amount of this against the individual. I believe that it is part of the “adult bullying” equation which is tightly entwined with misuse of authority and position. People like Harold ultimately end up as victims and somehow, we let it happen.

  3. Sandra Anholt says:

    Regardless of who is right or wrong on this issue, this publication is the wrong forum for political commentary and in my opinion this article has no place here.

    If OHS Canada is to go down the road of political commentary and apparent political bias as well, its credibility as a reliable, balanced and neutral source of information regarding occupational health and safety is diminished in my view.

  4. M Patterson says:

    Well spoken Sandra.

  5. “An injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” (Martin Luther King Jr.)

    Now that successive Canadian governments (i.e., “elected MPs”) have shown themselves incapable of following their own rules, regulations (i.e., laws, orders) by ignoring successive rulings of the federal court over the past 18+ years, how should we remove these outlaws and attempt to establish some type of law and order for all Canadians in the next federal election?

    As several similar ‘back-stabbing’ actions have been previously noted with governments and/or their MPs, ignoring their legislated obligations and/or ‘promises’ to the men and women who have served this country (with the ‘laying down’ of their lives, in some cases) what further proof is required to identify how these same governments (and/or their composite MPs) continue to ignore their legislated obligations to all Canadian citizens/tax-payers?

    Given that (federal) elections are approaching, what would you suggest be added to this onslaught of MP dis-honesty to obtain some reasonable result?

    After more than 18 years of witnessing the moronic migration from ruthless denials to blatant lies, how can any rational and sane citizen not both deny and remove their support from this Canadian government?

    Given the hundreds and thousands of above-referenced contradictions between government promises and the unscrupulous manner in which the government has treated veterans (of the CF and mounted police) over the past 90+ years, what unscrupulous contradictions exist between the governments’ promises and the manner in which they treat all Canadian citizens?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *