DAILY NEWS Oct 22, 2012 9:25 AM - 2 comments

Toronto relaxes touching bylaw in strip clubs

TEXT SIZE bigger text smaller text
By: Sabrina Nanji
Oct. 22, 2012
2012-10-22

TORONTO (Canadian OH&S News)

Proposed changes to Toronto’s bylaws surrounding the adult entertainment industry could relax interactions between workers and their patrons, but one industry group is pushing for even wider reforms.

On Oct. 19, the Licensing and Standards Committee approved amendments to the municipal code following recommendations from city staff, who argued that previous “no-touching” policies prohibited inoffensive contact in strip clubs, such as a handshake or the accidental brushing of an arm or leg when walking by.

Because of such strict rules, the industry approached city staff with complaints, saying that they affected the safety of their work environment, making it difficult to report unwanted contact or increasing the chances of being charged for such innocuous interactions.

“Staff propose to achieve this balance by amending the bylaw, where appropriate, to include changes to the current ‘no-touch’ and ‘unobstructed-view’ provisions, bylaw terminology, construction standards for private performance areas, and provisions to address working conditions of the entertainers,” the authors of the staff report wrote.

Councillor Cesar Palacio, chair of the licensing committee, agreed with the recommendations.

“The industry came in and said there was a possibility under the old bylaw that two people shaking hands, that technically would be against the bylaw and they could be charged. So what we’ve done now is clarified it. The new bylaw is going to specify certain parts of the body that you can’t touch or can’t be touched,” said Mike Makrigiorgos, executive assistant to Coun. Palacio. “We haven’t loosened the rules, we’ve just clarified it.”

Should the changes receive the final nod from city councillors, they would come into force on Feb. 1, 2013.

Bylaw gave cops carte blanche to arrest workers

However, the Adult Entertainment Association of Canada (AEAC), said that though the amendments are a step towards safer strip clubs, they should be pushed back further.

“The reason for it to be changed was that the courts have said that unless any inappropriate activity would happen, benign contact was permitted and not considered indecent by our community standards and our society,” said Tim Lambrinos, the AEAC’s executive director.

Lambrinos went on to say that previously confusing bylaw language did not prevent unwanted touching and instead gave law enforcement officers carte blanche to arrest workers and customers for non-sexual contact.

“We’ve heard from entertainers in the past who were harassed and hauled into court for just shaking someone’s hand or accidentally bumping into somebody,” he said.

But as far as local councillors are concerned, scaling back the laws even further may expose workers to a slew of risks.

“We’re not in favour of that. A lot of the entertainers that staff spoke to said they want to do this to make some money, that they don’t want to do other things, but that they want to be protected,” explained Makrigiorgos. “Because if we open it up, then the patrons might expect more and they might be forced to do more. So that’s why we made it clear that we’re not in favour of loosening those rules at all.”

In order to protect entertainers in the industry, Lambrinos argued that there must be clearer definitions of “sex” included in the legal wording.

“We don’t feel that the changes they’re making are clear enough to prohibit sexual contact. That’s what we really want to define. So we’re going to be recommending that the definition of prohibited physical contact include specified sexual activities,” Lambrinos added.

The proposed amendments will be tabled by City Council on Oct. 30.



Horizontal ruler

Reader Comments

Most recent firstOldest first

Melissa

Sure Patrick, let's legalize the sexual exploitation of women and young girls. Why not make Human Trafficking legal? Would you be so quick to vote for legalization if your own sister or daughter was lured into the Sex trade by a very manipulative individual? I think not. I have yet to meet a woman anywhere who's in the sex trade because she loves the work.

Posted June 4, 2014 02:25 PM


Patrick

Wake up! legalize the sex trade so police can go after real bad people - don't be so hypocritical; you've legalized alcohol when it suited your tax needs and you legalized gambling when it suited your tax needs - legalize the sex trade so we don't have to hear about it anymore and move onto real problems.

Posted October 23, 2012 09:11 AM


FirstPrevNextLast
Horizontal Ruler

Post A Comment

Disclaimer
Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that OHS Canada has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published and those that are published will not be edited. However, all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Your Name (this will appear with your post) *

Email Address (will not be published) *

Comments *



* mandatory fields