Law File
-
WHOSE LINE IS
IT ANYWAY?
By Dean Jobb
-
NO NEED TO
IDENTIFY CAUSE
By Angela Stelmakowich
-
SOME WORKERS OFF
TO COURT
By Donalee
Moulton
Financial settlements
-
THEY LAY
PRACTITIONER BLUES
By Paul Barker
-
TWO STEPS BACK
By Richard Anstruther
-
DUE
TO DILIGENCE MORE THAN STANDARD
By Mary Beth Currie
Does compliance with an industry standards equal due diligence? A
ruling out of Ontario has added a new twist.
-
RIGHTING AN OLD
WRONG
By Cheryl A. Edwards and George Parris
It may be the most important legal development in health and
safety prosecutions since R. v. Sault Ste. Marie established the
defence of due diligence -- and it may have a bigger and more
immediate impact.
-
DISCIPLINE FOR SAFETY INFRACTIONS
(OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES)
Cheryl A. Edwards (Stringer Brisbin Humphrey)
(The due diligence implications of enforcing safety
practices through discipline, Jan/Feb, 2000)
-
DOOMED IF YOU DON'T
Peter Strahlendorf
(Supervisory due diligence and the law, Jan/Feb, 1998)
-
DELEGATING SAFETY?
Cheryl A. Edwards (Stringer Brisbin Humphrey)
(The legal requirements for the health and safety of workers
of contractors, July/August, 2000
-
WHO PAYS FOR PPE?
Jennifer McLaughlin
(The oh&s legislation is far from clear on whose responsiblity it is to
pay for personal protective equipment, July/August, 1999)
-
EXTREME MEASURES
Robert C. Brun and Laura A. Wright
(Video surveillance, the WCB and the law, Jan/Feb, 1997
-
ALCOHOL IN THE WORKPLACE
David P. Church and Sharon D. Matthews
(The legal pitfalls of prividing alcohol at work, July/Aug,
1996)
-
THE UNSAFE CO-WORKER
David Coté
(Can a worker refuse to work with someone he or she
considers dangerous? June, 1999)
-
LIABLE FOR THE CONSEQUENCES?
Norman Keith
(Can a safety professional be held liable for bad advice? Aug/Sept, 1998)
-
LINK TO CANADIAN OH&S LEGISLATION
Government sites with oh&s legislation on-line
|
